Lagos, Nigeria – In a bold and unvarnished revelation, Nigerian journalist David Hundeyin has publicly denounced an alleged conspiracy involving foreign interests aimed at undermining the Dangote Refinery. Hundeyin’s disclosure has sparked vigorous debate about external influences on African economies, particularly Nigeria’s. “A message needs to be sent to a group of external interests working in tandem with internal interests to counteract the interests of half a billion West Africans,” Hundeyin asserted. This revelation was shared on his official X handle, where it quickly gained traction among followers and industry watchers.
Last week, Hundeyin claims he was approached by Dialogue Earth, an international NGO, with an offer of N800,000 to pen an article arguing against the refinery’s environmental impact. “The thrust of the brief,” Hundeyin noted, “was for a prominent local voice to advocate for halting the refinery using environmental concerns as a pretext.” Dialogue Earth, formerly known as China Dialogue Trust, allegedly sought to recruit Hundeyin to voice opposition under the guise of environmental advocacy, a claim he believes exposes a larger agenda that extends beyond environmental concerns.
Identifying the NGO’s funders as various American intelligence fronts, including the Ford Foundation and ClimateWorks, Hundeyin alleged that these organizations are orchestrating a campaign to resist Nigeria’s industrial self-sufficiency. “For whatever reason, it is now quietly mobilizing a resistance campaign against what it describes as ‘Nigeria’s first refinery,’” Hundeyin remarked. This, he suggests, points to a broader strategy to keep Africa dependent on international oil markets, undermining its ability to manage and profit from its own natural resources.
Hundeyin criticized the narrative that exporting raw materials and importing refined goods was environmentally harmless. Meanwhile, Europe’s blending of West African fuel with hazardous levels of toxins seemed to escape similar scrutiny. “Nigeria having a refinery to end import dependency is where Dialogue Earth and its funders draw the line,” he stated, underscoring the selective environmental focus of the NGO. Hundeyin’s revelations invite a closer examination of who benefits from maintaining the status quo and at what environmental and economic costs to Africa.
Emphasizing transparency and the necessity of public accountability, Hundeyin expressed the need to reveal these alleged conspiracies, which he argues are designed to maintain Africa’s economic stagnation. “These people believe that Africans should not exist or have nice things in this world,” Hundeyin declared with palpable exasperation. His commentary highlights the enduring struggle for self-determination and the latent colonial dynamics that persist in modern global economic relationships.
In taking this public stance, Hundeyin acknowledges the professional risks involved, recognizing that his actions might jeopardize jobs and livelihoods. “The message needs to be passed,” he stressed, advocating against succumbing to financial incentives that perpetuate systemic poverty. Hundeyin’s decision to make this information public serves as a call to action for other African journalists and influencers to remain vigilant against being used as tools by foreign interests.
Hundeyin’s skepticism toward climate-oriented agendas further fueled his critique. “I am not a believer in the religious faith called Climate Change/Saving The Environment,” he confessed, dismissively comparing it to the environmental destruction historically perpetrated by Western nations. This stance challenges prevailing narratives and invites debate on the intersection of environmental advocacy and economic independence.
Asserting African sovereignty over its resources, Hundeyin insisted, “It is 100% OUR prerogative to determine what to do with our hydrocarbons,” rejecting external dictates cloaked in environmental concern. His position reinforces the importance of local agency in determining the future of Africa’s energy sector and the broader implications for economic autonomy.
Notably, Hundeyin distanced himself from any personal affiliation with Aliko Dangote while acknowledging the broader economic implications. “I’m also smart enough to know when rich white men… are trying to use me as a marionette,” he said, condemning attempts to exploit African influencers as pawns in larger economic games. Hundeyin’s statement reflects a nuanced understanding of bi-national economic tensions and the need for principled stances in journalism.
David Hundeyin
In a direct challenge, Hundeyin urged those feeling threatened by Nigeria’s oil independence to confront the issue directly. “You should come out and fight Aliko Dangote by yourself,” he challenged, maintaining his resolve against being manipulated. His call underscores an appeal for transparency and fortitude against covert economic warfare tactics.
Hundeyin’s resolute defiance is a testament to the resilience of African voices advocating for change and sovereignty. “It will never be me,” he vowed, underscoring his commitment to integrity and resistance against becoming an instrument of external interests. His stance draws attention to the broader theme of patriotism in preserving national interests amidst global pressures.
Widely shared and discussed, Hundeyin’s disclosures on his X handle rally fellow Nigerians and Africans to critically assess the motivations behind foreign interventions. The discourse highlights the importance of unity and vigilance in safeguarding the continent’s resources and economic potential. Hundeyin’s assertions have resonated with many who view the attempts to destabilize Nigeria’s oil independence as part of a larger pattern of neocolonialism, where foreign entities exert influence over Africa’s economic and political landscapes under various pretenses.
Amidst the growing discourse, some supporters emphasize the necessity of scrutinizing foreign-funded NGOs and their motives, advocating for increased transparency and accountability in African media and public policy initiatives. This incident involving David Hundeyin serves as a poignant reminder of the complexities surrounding resource management and international relations, urging a reevaluation of partnerships and alliances that truly serve African interests.
The broader conversation sparked by Hundeyin’s revelations could potentially lead to stronger regulatory frameworks and enhanced public awareness regarding the true purpose and impact of foreign interventions in Africa. By exposing such alleged plots, Hundeyin not only bolsters the call for economic sovereignty but also inspires a more conscientious approach towards sustainable development—one that prioritizes the genuine needs and aspirations of the African people over external influence. GMTNewsng